CO129-261 - Public Offices & Others - 1893 — Page 445

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

In the matter of an application for a Hong Kong Patent by "The Stairfield Manufacturing Co." under the Patent Ordinance, 1892.

70, Chancery Lane, London, Jan 14 FC 93)

1st December, 1893

At Mr. Whe Scott Moncrieff

Reference to your letter to me of 21st November, and my interview with you on 29th November, I submit that I have precisely followed the instructions of the Ordinance, but to avoid giving you further trouble in the matter and having the papers again returned to me, I have endeavoured to comply with your requirements, but would state in reply to your paragraphs-

(2) That I have appointed Mr H.J. Dinnis of Hong Kong to act as my substitute in Hong Kong, and I have written to him by this mail. I do not think under the Ordinance that a local agent is required, but I admit the desirability of such appointment. If it can be waived I should prefer it.

(3) (a) The Declaration originally bears a notarial stamp, but it is so faint as to be very easily overlooked. I have got the same notaries to re-seal and stamp it.

(b) No Power of Attorney whatever...

Page 20467

443

...

Page 20467

443

...

becomes

Page 20467

443

70, Chancery Lane's

Jan 14 FC 93) London, we.

1st. December, 1893.

was reordered to

70, Chancery Lane, London, Jan 14 FC 93)

1st December, 1893

revised response:

Page 20467

443

70, Chancery Lane, London, Jan 14 FC 93)

1st December, 1893

In the matter of an application for a Hong Kong Patent by "The Stairfield Manufacturing Co." under the Patent Ordinance, 1892.

At Mr. Whe Scott Moncrieff

Reference to your letter to me of 21st November, and my interview with you on 29th November, I submit that I have precisely followed the instructions of the Ordinance, but to avoid giving you further trouble in the matter and having the papers again returned to me, I have endeavoured to comply with your requirements, but would state in reply to your paragraphs-

(2) That I have appointed Mr H.J. Dinnis of Hong Kong to act as my substitute in Hong Kong, and I have written to him by this mail. I do not think under the Ordinance that a local agent is required, but I admit the desirability of such appointment. If it can be waived I should prefer it.

(3) (a) The Declaration originally bears a notarial stamp, but it is so faint as to be very easily overlooked. I have got the same notaries to re-seal and stamp it.

(b) No Power of Attorney whatever...

Page 20467

443

...

Edit History

2026-05-27 08:17:50 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
In the matter of an application for a Hong Kong Patent by "The Stairfield Manufacturing Co." under the Patent Ordinance, 1892. 70, Chancery Lane, London, Jan 14 FC 93) 1st December, 1893 At Mr. Whe Scott Moncrieff Reference to your letter to me of 21st November, and my interview with you on 29th November, I submit that I have precisely followed the instructions of the Ordinance, but to avoid giving you further trouble in the matter and having the papers again returned to me, I have endeavoured to comply with your requirements, but would state in reply to your paragraphs- (2) That I have appointed Mr H.J. Dinnis of Hong Kong to act as my substitute in Hong Kong, and I have written to him by this mail. I do not think under the Ordinance that a local agent is required, but I admit the desirability of such appointment. If it can be waived I should prefer it. (3) (a) The Declaration originally bears a notarial stamp, but it is so faint as to be very easily overlooked. I have got the same notaries to re-seal and stamp it. (b) No Power of Attorney whatever... Page 20467 443 ... Page 20467 443 ... becomes Page 20467 443 70, Chancery Lane's Jan 14 FC 93) London, we. 1st. December, 1893. was reordered to 70, Chancery Lane, London, Jan 14 FC 93) 1st December, 1893 revised response: Page 20467 443 70, Chancery Lane, London, Jan 14 FC 93) 1st December, 1893 In the matter of an application for a Hong Kong Patent by "The Stairfield Manufacturing Co." under the Patent Ordinance, 1892. At Mr. Whe Scott Moncrieff Reference to your letter to me of 21st November, and my interview with you on 29th November, I submit that I have precisely followed the instructions of the Ordinance, but to avoid giving you further trouble in the matter and having the papers again returned to me, I have endeavoured to comply with your requirements, but would state in reply to your paragraphs- (2) That I have appointed Mr H.J. Dinnis of Hong Kong to act as my substitute in Hong Kong, and I have written to him by this mail. I do not think under the Ordinance that a local agent is required, but I admit the desirability of such appointment. If it can be waived I should prefer it. (3) (a) The Declaration originally bears a notarial stamp, but it is so faint as to be very easily overlooked. I have got the same notaries to re-seal and stamp it. (b) No Power of Attorney whatever... Page 20467 443 ...
Baseline (Original)
Sit In 20467 443 70, Chancery Lane's Jan 14 FC 93) London, we. 1st. December, 1893. In the matter of an application At Mr. Whe Scott. Moncrieff under ong Kong Patent by "The Patent Ordinance, 1892. reference to of 21 st. November, and ма that Il have. Stairfield 01 your letter to me. mij interview with inte 29th November, I submit precisely followed the instructions of the Ordinance, but to avoid giving you further trouble in the matter and having the papers again returned. to me, I have endeavoured to comply with your requirements, but would state in reply to your hḥata. your haragraphs- (2) That I have appointed It H.J. Dinnys of stong Kong to act as my substitute in Hong Long, and I have written him by this mail. fully I do not think under the Ordinance that a local agent is required, but I admit the desirability of such appointment. If it can be waived I should prefer it. (3) (a) The Declaration originally bears a notarial stamp, but it is so faint have as to be got very easily overlooked. the same notaries to te- seal and stamp it. (b) No Tower of Attorney whatever
2026-05-27 08:17:50 · Baseline
View content

Sit

In

20467

443

70, Chancery Lane's

Jan 14 FC 93) London, we.

1st. December, 1893.

In the matter of an application

At

Mr. Whe Scott. Moncrieff under

ong Kong Patent by "The Patent Ordinance, 1892.

reference to

of 21 st. November, and

ма

that Il have.

Stairfield

01

your

letter to me.

mij interview with

inte

29th November, I submit

precisely followed the instructions of the Ordinance, but to avoid giving you further trouble in the matter and having

the

papers again returned. to me, I have endeavoured to comply

with

your requirements, but would state in reply to your hḥata.

your haragraphs-

(2) That I have appointed It H.J. Dinnys of stong Kong to act as my substitute in Hong Long, and I have written him by this mail.

fully

I do not think under the Ordinance that a local agent is required, but I admit the desirability of such appointment. If it can be waived I should prefer it.

(3) (a) The Declaration originally bears a notarial stamp, but it is so

faint

have

as to be

got

very easily overlooked.

the same notaries to te- seal and stamp it.

(b) No Tower

of Attorney

whatever

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.